The Prattler and Stooge of The Hizbiyyoon at Markaz As’Sunnah -Allies of Greenlane and Jamiat Ahle Hadeeth in Stoke On Trent- Makes a Fool of Himself Again By Transmitting The Old Hizbi Shubhah: [Are We Obliged To Follow The Stance of Scholar When He Makes Tabdee?]

 

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Once again the prattler and stooge of the hizbiyyoon at Markaz As-Sunnah made a fool of himself! He visits the websites of the followers of the innovator Ali Al-Halabi and transmits their spider wed doubts. His latest prattling revolves around the affair as to whether we are obliged to follow the stance of scholar when he makes Tabdee. This is an old refuted doubt of the hizbiyyoon, but because the prattler is an ill-informed newcomer and amateur doubt monger, he chooses to do the doggy job of his employers at Markaz As-Sunnah, rather than sincerely acquaint himself with the sound principles of the Salafi Manhaj. Here is a short clarification for the prattler – either he accepts it (may Allaah guide him) or he continues to follow his desires and carry on doing the doggy job of his employers at Markaz As-Sunnah. Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) says:

He (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) sent individuals to Bahrain, Oman and Yemen and their narrations were accepted; so how about in this present time of ours when there are ten or fifty Salafi (scholars) who are in agreement regarding a particular affair, but their narrations are rejected. And those who reject them, say: ‘’There has to be a consensus of all the scholars.’’  And from the false principles of these people is that they say: ‘’we neither accept criticism against a person nor a praise for him even if many of the contemporary scholars say that such a person is an innovator.’’ 

Therefore be warned against these people, because they make a claim to Salafiyyah, whilst seeking to destroy the Salafi Methodology, its principles and foundations.  How many false precepts do they have, such as their saying: ‘’I am not obliged to (take/accept) the speech of such and such a Shaikh?!’’  You find a scholar quoting and refuting the affairs of misguidance found in the Book of such and such a person, in such and such page, yet you find these people saying: ‘’I am not obliged to (take/accept) the speech of such and such a Shaikh?!’’

This statement of theirs is a principle by way of which they seek to shun and reject truth.  It is a false principle by way of which they seek to reject the sound principles of Jarh Wat-Tadeel.  Therefore, learn the sound principles of Jarh Wat-Tadeel and look to the methodology of the Salaf; and leave alone these who misguide. They bring turmoil upon the true religion of Allaah and upon the Methodology of the Salaf and its followers. http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/02/they-say-we-are-not-obliged-to-take-the-speech-of-the-shaikh-so-how-many-trustworthy-scholars-do-they-need-in-order-to-abandon-the-innovators/

Also see link here – Refuting the Satanic Principle; There has to be a Consensus on a refuted person before the refutation is accepted

https://youtu.be/5TdqimZf0zY

To be continued InShaaAllaah

Jarh Wat Tadeel [A Reminder to The Prattler – (Stooge of the Hizbiyyoon at Markaz As’Sunnah -Allies of Greenlane and Jamiat Ahle Hadith UK in Stoke OnTrent)- Who Seeks Excuses For The Deviants of Ihyaa At-Turaath]

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Indeed, the prattler- stooge of the Hizbiyyoon at Markaz As’Sunnah- is grasping at straws and seeking for ways to justify his deviations and that of his companions at Markaz as’Sunnah. This necessitates that he will follow desires and further abandon sound principles. So he desperately presents the statements of praise for Ihyaa At-Turaath, whilst being wilfully oblivious of the fact that he only increases himself in misguidance. So here we present to the reader few issues about Jarh Wat-Tadeel (Criticism and Praise)…

The Correct Stance on the Differing of the Scholars Regarding Jarh and Tadeel –By Shaikh Ubaid

http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/11/the-correct-stance-towards-the-differing-of-the-scholars-concerning-jarh-and-tadeel-shaikh-ubaid-may-allaah-preserve-him/

Shaikh Rabee on Those Who Utilise the raise of other scholars to reject evidences

http://www.salaficentre.com/2012/05/shaikh-rabee-on-al-jarh-wa-tadeel-criticism-praise-2/

Shaikh Muhammad Baazmool Clarifies Issues of Jarh Wat-Tadeel

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/printthread.cfm?Forum=23&Topic=1113

A Rely to the Hizbiyyoon -Those Who hide behind the Mashaayikh

http://www.abukhadeejah.com/but-shaikh-so-and-so-went-to-their-conference-so-they-must-be-good-right-shaikh-ubaid-answers/

So after acquainting ourselves with the fact that the detailed criticism against Ihyaa At-Turaath takes precedence over the general praise they have received, the dishonesty of the stooge becomes apparent. Here are the statements of the scholars against Ihyaa At-Turaath in Arabic for the stooge. May Alaah guide him or protect us from his falsehood Aameen

http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/01/arabic-audio-scholars-speak-against-ihyaa-turaath/

 

Previous and Recent Responses to that Prattler – [A Stooge of the Hizbiyyoon at Markaz As-Sunnah -Allies of Greenlane and Jamiat Ahle Hadith UK in (Stoke-On-Trent)]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Firstly: The following links contain a rebuttal of that stooge of the Hizbiyyoon at Markaz as-Sunnah (The allies of Greenlane in Stoke-On-Trent) – a caller who sought and still seeks to spread his absurd doubts amongst some of the brothers by way of text messages.

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2015/08/31/1-a-notification-to-the-confused-and-bewildered-caller-to-brotherhood-at-markaz-as-sunnah-stoke-on-trent-allies-of-the-hizbiyyoon-of-greenlanes-admin/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2015/09/01/2-a-notification-to-the-confused-and-bewildered-caller-to-brotherhood-at-markaz-as-sunnah-stoke-on-trent-help-yourself-before-you-help-others-because-you-are-in-need-of-sound-manhaj-otherwise/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2015/09/01/3-a-notification-to-the-confused-and-bewildered-caller-to-brotherhood-at-markaz-as-sunnah-stoke-on-trent-obtain-clear-knowledge-of-what-blameworthy-taqleed-is-before-accusing-others-based-on-ja/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2015/09/02/4-the-confused-and-bewildered-caller-to-brotherhood-markaz-as-sunnah-stoke-on-trent-said-hujja-is-quraan-and-hadeeth-besides-prophet-muhammad-peace-be-upon-him-e/

Secondly: The stooge has started spreading his doubts again and we have already started a series of articles to address issues around his shubuhaat. See the following links:

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/18/whoever-sits-with-ahlul-bidah-is-not-safe-from-one-of-three-calamities-by-imaam-sufyaan-ath-thawri/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/18/salaf-fled-from-ahlul-bidah-but-some-masaakeen-youths-end-up-in-misguidance-due-to-accompanying-ahlul-bidah/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/18/do-the-salafiyyoon-of-masjid-al-furqaan-believe-that-one-is-declared-a-mubtadi-straight-away-if-he-does-not-make-tabdee-of-a-mubtadi-a-reply-to-one-of-the-devilish-insinuations-of-some-of-the-hizbiy/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/18/manhaj-questions-and-answers-on-the-opposers-innovators-on-companionship-tabdee-hajar-and-related-affairs/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/15/part-1-thorns-in-the-throats-of-the-hizbiyyoon-of-our-town-allies-of-greenlane/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/16/part-2-thorns-in-the-throats-of-the-hizbiyyoon-of-our-town-allies-of-greenlane/

http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2016/08/16/part-3-thorns-in-the-throats-of-the-hizbiyyoon-of-our-town-allies-of-jamiat-ahle-hadith-uk/

Finally: The hizbiyyoon at Markaz As-Sunnah (allies of Greenlane and Jamiat Ahle Hadeeth UK) keep silent as if they do not desire any fitna, yet they are shelterers of this stooge -loud mouth- who is foolish enough to spread Shubuhaat. Therefore, we will –InShaaAllaah continue to warn against his doubts.  May Allaah guide him or protect us from his evil. Aameen

Part 1: Thorns In The Throats of The Hizbiyyoon of Our Town [Allies of Greenlane]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

A Destructive Manhaj of The Mu’mayyi’oon!

https://www.salaficentre.com/2016/07/reminder-adopt-particular-path-ihyaa-turaaths-mentor-order-harm-sp-salafiyyoon-west/

Arabic Audio: Scholars Unveil The Misguidance of Ihyaa At-Turaath

http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/01/arabic-audio-scholars-speak-against-ihyaa-turaath/

Verdicts of the scholars against Abul Hasan al-Maribi

https://www.salaficentre.com/2014/04/verdicts-of-the-scholars-against-abul-hasan-al-maribi-al-mubtadi-an-ally-of-masjid-as-sunnah/

Regarding Abu al-Hasan al-Ma’ribee al-Ikhwani: Why Shaykh Rabee’ Was Correct and Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin al-Abbaad Was Wrong (Yet Both Are Rewarded)

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/nvskb-why-shaykh-rabee-was-correct-and-shaykh-abdul-muhsin-al-abbaad-was-wrong-yet-both-are-rewarded.cfm

 

 

Are the issues between Greenlane Mosque and Masjid As-Salafi Person?

https://www.salaficentre.com/2015/08/are-the-issues-between-greenlane-mosque-and-masjid-as-salafi-personal-listen-to-this-unquestionable-clarification/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brief Acquaintance With The Facts Behind Unjustified and Justified Criticisms!

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

A sensible and honest person should ask himself/herself: “What is the basis of Shaikh Wasiyullaah’s criticism against Maktabah Salafiyyah and what is the basis of the praises received by Maktabah Salafiyyah from Shaikh Rabee, Shaikh ‘Ubaid, Shaikh Muhammad Bin Haadee, Shaikh Abdullaah al-Bukhaari, Shaikh Hasan al-Banna and others?

Indeed, the basis of Shaikh’s Wasiyullaah’s criticism was due to the uncompromising and courageous stance Maktabah As-Salafiyyah took against Suhaib Hasan, Abdul Haadi, Jamiat ahle Hadeeth and Abu Usaama. This is the basis of the Shaikh’s criticisms. So before examining the evidences, ask yourself the following questions:

So ask yourself the following questions:

*Does Maktabah As- Salafiyyah defend or co-operate with a single Mubtadi?

*Does Maktabah As-Salafiyyah have any links with a single Mubtadi or an organization that defends Mubtadi’ah?

 *Do they co-operate with the Jamaa’aat Siyaasiyah or those who co-operate with such Jamaa’aat?

*Do they co-operate with any other group of bidah or anyone associated with them?

*Do they promote the innovated principles of Hasan Al-Banna and Ikhwaan al muslimeen, or associate with anyone who does so?

*Do they uphold the false Manhaj of Muwaazanah or associate with anyone who promotes such false principles?

*Do they defend Sayyid Qutb or co-operate with anyone who defends him?

*Do they endorse the false principles: “We do not disparage but we only correct mistakes’’ and “Let’s not make our differing about someone else a reason for differing amongst ourselves.’’

*Do they make a differentiation between Aqeedah and Manhaj when the scholars pass judgements against the people of bidah, or do they have a link with anyone who calls to these false principles?

*Do they hold the false view that the Salaf differed in Aqeedah, or do they have a link with anyone who holds this false view?

*Do they revile the Sahaabah and defend those who call them Ghuthaa-iyyah, or co-operate with anyone who defends such people?

*Do they utilise innovated principles in order to place the misguided sects, parties and organizations into the arena of ahlus Sunnah, or do they co-operate with anyone who deliberately utilises such false principles?

*Do they utilise the principles of the contemporary Mubtadi’ah, such as Ali Al-Halabi, Abul Hasan al-Maribi, Muhammad Al-Maghraawi, Yahyah al-Hajoori and others similar to them, or do they co-operate with anyone who defends these Mubtadi’ah after being well aware of the unambiguous knowledge based refutations against them?

*Do they praise Ahmad Raza Khan Brelvi, or was it Abdul Haadi who praised Him?

*Do they praise the Mubtadi – Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq- or was it not Abu Usaama who transmitted a praise on his behalf?

Examine the reality of the following people!

Are The Issues Between Greenlane Mosque [GLM] and Salafipublications Person?

Are the issues between Green Lane Mosque [GLM] and Salafi Publications Personal?

 

What is the reality of jamiat ahle hadeeth

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=3384

What is the reality of suhaib hasan

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=19&Topic=1637

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=9215

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=12494

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=12079

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=12076

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=7334

What is the reality of abdul Hadi

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=6023

What is the reality of abu usama

http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1216-A-Response-to-the-Deceit-of-Abu-Usaamah-Khalifah-and-His-Lying-Tongue

So after examining the evidences against the above organizations and individuals, do we find Maktabah As-Salafiyyah upon these clear Manhaj errors? Do we find the students at Maktabah Salafiyyah upon the platforms of the innovators? Indeed, never do we find Maktabah As- Salafiyyah co-operating with the people of bidah and this is a favour of Allaah upon them. Therefore, do we ignore the proofs and follow desires, or do we ask Allaah for Tawfeeq and follow what is correct? A sensible and honest person knows that the Manhaj of Greenlane and Jamiat Ahl Hadeeth is tainted with Hizbiyyah based on their companions and affiliates mentioned above. We ask Allaah for Ikhlaas, Thabaat, Sidq and Husnul Khaatimah…Aameen.


3 Days Has Passed, But We’re Still Waiting for Markaz at-Tawheed, Markaz al-Huda and Markaz as-Sunnah to announce Their Stance towards Usaamah Bin Laadin, Zakir Niak and Lashkar Taibah

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Allaah (The Most High) stated:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا كُونُوا قَوَّامِينَ بِالْقِسْطِ شُهَدَاءَ لِلَّهِ وَلَوْ عَلَىٰ أَنْفُسِكُمْ أَوِ الْوَالِدَيْنِ وَالْأَقْرَبِينَ ۚ إِنْ يَكُنْ غَنِيًّا أَوْ فَقِيرًا فَاللَّهُ أَوْلَىٰ بِهِمَا ۖ فَلَا تَتَّبِعُوا الْهَوَىٰ أَنْ تَعْدِلُوا ۚ وَإِنْ تَلْوُوا أَوْ تُعْرِضُوا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ خَبِيرًا

O you who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah, even though it be against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, be he rich or poor, Allah is a Better Protector to both (than you). So follow not the lusts (of your hearts), lest you may avoid justice, and if you distort your witness or refuse to give it, verily, Allah is Ever Well-Acquainted with what you do. [4:135]

Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) said: We call to the methodology of the Salaf—to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger.  We utilize them as proofs in our creed; in our acts of worship; in our stances; in our relationship with the rulers and the ruled and in our relationship with the groups and sects.  As for others, they play games and tricks.  By Allaah! You do not find them except that they play tricks and games with the passion (or inclinations) of the youth. [End of quote]

O Markaz at-Tawheed, Markaz al-Huda and Markaz as-Sunnah! We are still waiting for your stance towards Usaamah Bin Laadin, Zakir Niak and Lashkar Taibah! Indeed Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz (rahimahullaah) refuted Usamah Bin Laadin. See page 4 in this pdf:

Bin-Baaz_Says_Bin_laadin_Is_Misguided

Also see link:

http://www.takfiris.com/takfir/articles/kpavv-usamah-bin-laden-is-a-takfiri-kharijite-and-is-worse-than-the-kharijites-of-old-by-far.cfm

O Markaz at-Tawheed, Markaz as-Sunnah and Markaz al-Huda! What is your stance after Imaam Bin Baaz (rahimahullaah) has clarified with unambiguous evidences to show that Usaamah Bin Laadin is misguided? Once again, we remind you of Allaah’s (The Most High):

Allaah (The Most High) stated:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا كُونُوا قَوَّامِينَ بِالْقِسْطِ شُهَدَاءَ لِلَّهِ وَلَوْ عَلَىٰ أَنْفُسِكُمْ أَوِ الْوَالِدَيْنِ وَالْأَقْرَبِينَ ۚ إِنْ يَكُنْ غَنِيًّا أَوْ فَقِيرًا فَاللَّهُ أَوْلَىٰ بِهِمَا ۖ فَلَا تَتَّبِعُوا الْهَوَىٰ أَنْ تَعْدِلُوا ۚ وَإِنْ تَلْوُوا أَوْ تُعْرِضُوا فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ خَبِيرًا

O you who believe! Stand out firmly for justice, as witnesses to Allah, even though it be against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, be he rich or poor, Allah is a Better Protector to both (than you). So follow not the lusts (of your hearts), lest you may avoid justice, and if you distort your witness or refuse to give it, verily, Allah is Ever Well-Acquainted with what you do. [4:135]

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah

 

[5] The Confused Caller to Brotherhood Neither Elaborates On What Type of Evil Suspicion Is Blameworthy Nor Does He Narrate What Made Him Deserving of Rebuke! So If He Ever Exaggerates Again, In Order to Twist The True State of Affairs About His Behaviour And Blame Others, We’ll Have No Choice But To Expose Him In Detail

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful The Bestower of Mercy

Allaah (The Most High) said:

يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اجْتَنِبُوا كَثِيرًا مِّنَ الظَّنِّ إِنَّ بَعْضَ الظَّنِّ إِثْمٌ

O you who believe! Avoid much suspicions, indeed some suspicions are sins. 49:12

—————————————————————————————————————–

The Admin at Masjid Al-Furqan have factual and eye witness evidences regarding the behaviour of the confused caller to brotherhood at Markaz as-Sunnah (i.e. allies of Greenlane’s Hizbi Admin). Therefore, if he does not refrain from twisting the true state of affairs and continue seeking to blame others for his bad behaviour, we will ask witnesses from Wolverhampton and Birmingham to bear witness to what he did and why he was rebuked.

——————————————————————————————————————

Imaam as-Saa’di (rahimahullaah) said: Allaah (The Most High) has forbidden much evil (sinful) suspicion towards the believers, because some suspicions are sins.  And that is like the suspicion devoid of reality and factual evidence, and like the suspicion accompanied by much forbidden speech and action. For indeed, the settlement of evil suspicion in the heart does not restrict the one (in whose heart is that evil suspicion) only to that; rather, he does not cease until he utters and does that which is not permissible. [For Further detail, see Tayseer]

The confused caller to brotherheed at Markaz as-Sunnah (allies of Greenlane’s Hizbi Admin) claims that the Salafiyyoon at Masjid Al-Furqan harboured evil suspicion against him! Indeed, what the confused caller to brotherhood deliberately ignores is that not all types of evil suspicions are blameworthy. The forbidden evil suspicion is that one devoid of reality and factual evidence etc. As for the brothers at Masjid Al-Furqan, they have factual evidences and eye witnesses regarding the behaviour of this person. Therefore, if he ever seeks to twist the true state of affairs regarding his behaviour and blame others, we will ask witnesses from Wolverhampton and Birmingham to witness to what he did to deserve rebuke.

To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah