In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy
Allaah (The Most High) said:
لَيْسَ بِأَمَانِيِّكُمْ وَلَا أَمَانِيِّ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ ۗ مَنْ يَعْمَلْ سُوءًا يُجْزَ بِهِ وَلَا يَجِدْ لَهُ مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ وَلِيًّا وَلَا نَصِيرًا
“It will not be in accordance with your desires (Muslims), nor those of the People of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), whosoever works evil, will have the recompense thereof).”
Imaam as-Sa’di (rahimahullaah) stated that a person merely ascribing himself to any religion will not be of any benefit if he fails to produce evidence to support the soundness of his claims, for actions are what will either testify to the truthfulness of a claim or belie it. [For full details, see Tayseer Al-Kareem Ar-Rahmaan Fee Tafseer Kalaam Al-Mannaan]
Indeed once again those who either follow their desires or deliberately refuse to utilise their intellects are seeking to abandon reality, whilst clinging to delusion and wishful thinking. So they say: What is your verdict against Shaikh Wasiyullaah because he visits a Masjid you guys call hizbiyyoon. Reader: A sensible and truthful person should abandon the likes of these statements because they’re nothing else but emotional nonsense; rather a sensible person should ask himself, saying: What is the basis of the criticisms directed at Markaz at-Tawheed, Markaz As-Sunnah and Markaz al-Huda by Masjid Al-Furqan- is it because of Shaikh Wasiyullah or is it about the Manhaj of [Markaz At-Tawheed, Markaz As-Sunnah and Markaz al-Huda- the allies of the hizbiyyoon of Greenlane’s Admin?!]
Therefore, a sensible and truthful person will not deny the fact that the affair is about the Manhaj of these Maraakiz and not about Shaikh Wasiyullaah, regardless whether the Shaikh visits them or not. The reality of a Hizbi Markaz does not change due to the presence of a Shaikh. These Maraakiz in stoke are nothing else but an extension of Greenlane’s Manhaj and we find that one of Greenlane’s main caller to hizbiyyah and misguidance [the man of Bidah Abu Usama (Goldie)] lectures at Markaz at-Tawheed. See here about Abu Usama: http://www.salafitalk.com/threads/1216-A-Response-to-the-Deceit-of-Abu-Usaamah-Khalifah-and-His-Lying-Tongue
It is absolutely clear to the Admin of Masjid al-Furqaan, the Admin of Al-Markazus Salafi (Manchester) the Admin of Salafipublication and others that Markaz at-Tawheed, Markaz Al-Huda and Markaz as-Sunnah are allies of Greenlane’s Hizbi Admin and the man of bidah Abu Usama. Therefore, there is no need to discuss the matter with the confused caller to brotherhood at Markaz as-Sunnah because their companions are none else but the hardcore hizbiyyoon at Greenlane.
Abu Hurairah (radiyallaahu-anhu) said, the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said: A person is upon the religion of his friend, so let each one of you look at whom he befriends. [As-Saheehah: 97]
Ibn Mas’ ood (radiyallaahu-anhu) said: Indeed a person walks alongside and accompanies the one whom he loves and who is like him. (Al Ibaanah 2/476).
Al A’maah (rahimahullaah) said: They (the Salaf) did not used to ask anything more about a person after having asked about three affairs: Who he walks with, who he enters upon (i.e. visits) and who he associates with amongst the people. (Al Ibaanah 2/478)
Abdullah Ibn Mas’ood (radiyallaahu anhu) said: Make consideration of the (regions of the) earth by the names given to them and make consideration of a person by his companion. ” (Al Ibaanah 2/497).
Mu’aadh Bin Mu’aadh said to Yahyah bin Sa’eed, “Yaa Abaa Sa’eed! A person may hide his viewpoint from us, but he will not be able to hide this in his son or friend or in one whom he sits with. (Al Ibaanah 2/436)
Indeed Marakaz At-Tawheed, Markaz As-Sunnah and Markaz Al-Huda are allies of the hardcore hizbiyyoon at Greenlane’s Admin and Greenlane’s Admin are allies of the deviant organizations, such as Ihya Turaath and Al-Maghrib Institute. Markaz at-Tawheed in particular invited Adnaan Abdul-Qaadir of Ihya Turaath-(the student and shelterer of the ikhwaani innovator Abdur-Rahmaan Bin Abdul-Kaaliq): See here about Ihya Turaath- the allies of Greenlane: http://www.salafitalk.net/st/printthread.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=5220 and see here about the innovator Abdur Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq: http://salaficentre.com/2012/04/abdur-rahmaan-abdul-khaaliq-visits-shaikh-muhammad-al-banna-rahimahullaah/
However, the confused caller to brotherhood at Markaz as-Sunnah is ignorant of the fact that the Salafiyyoon of Masjid Al-Furqan and other Salafiyyoon have never warned against the likes of these Maraakiz except due to the fact that these Maraakiz are allies and shelterers of the hizbiyyoon at Greenlane- the allies of Ihya Turaath and Al-Maghrib Institute. So let it be known to the confused caller to brotherhood at Markaz as-Sunnah that we took a firm stance (by the Tawfeeq of Allaah) against Grenlane’s old Admin (under Jamiat Ahle Hadeeth and Abdul Haadi) due to their deviations, even though Shaikh Wasiyullah defended them. So Shaikh Wasiyullah criticized SP due to SP’s uncompromising and courageous stance against Suhaib Hasan, Abdul Haadi and Jamiat ahle Hadeeth. See here about Jamiat Ahle Hadeeth: See here: http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=3384
Likewise, the confused caller to brotherhood at Markaz as-Sunnah should be aware of the fact that we maintain the same stance against the New Hizbi Admin at Greenlane-allies of ahlul bidah and the deviants at Ihya Turaath and al-Maghrib Institute. Therefore O confused caller to brotherhood at Markaz as-Sunnah! This was the basis of the Shaikh’s criticism against SP and their Salafi brothers, and it has not ceased to be a criticism that is in opposition to reality and devoid of evidence.
On the other hand, Shaikh Wasiyullah’s or any other Shaikh’s visit to a Markaz of Hizbiyyah will not change the reality of such Markaz whilst they maintain their corrupt alliances with ahlul bidah, such as Ihya Turaath and its deviants like Adnaan Abdul Qaadir- the student of the innovator Abdur Rahmaan Bin Abdul Khaaliq. Shaikh Ubaid Bin Abdillaah Al-Jaabiri (may Allaah preserve him) said: The one who knows of a mistake and it is clear to him, then it is not permissible for him to blindly follow a scholar to whom an affair is hidden. And indeed you already heard yesterday that the scholars are not infallible in their Ijtihaadaat. Therefore, it is not permissible to adopt them (i.e. the mistakes of the scholars) as a methodology (to follow). http://salaficentre.com/2013/08/2-an-eye-opener-for-the-seeker-of-truth-alallaamah-ubaid-bin-abdillaah-al-jaabiri-answers/
Finally: We ask Markaz at-Tawheed, Markaz As-Sunnah and Markaz Al-Huda a simple question and that is: What is your stance towards Ahlul Bidah, such as Usama Bin Laadin- is he a khaariji or not? Likewise what is your stance towards Lashkar Taybah (Jamaa’atud Da’wah) and Zakair Niak? Are they upon the Sunnah and Salafiyyah or are they from Ahlul Bidah? Indeed, if you are truthful, then manifest your stance, just as Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali) said: We call to the methodology of the Salaf—to the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of the Messenger. We utilize them as proofs in our creed; in our acts of worship; in our stances; in our relationship with the rulers and the ruled and in our relationship with the groups and sects. As for others, they play games and tricks. By Allaah! You do not find them except that they play tricks and games with the passion (or inclinations) of the youth.
As for the Admin of Masjid al-Furqan, their Manhaj is manifest! They do not defend or co-operate with a single Mubtadi, such as Abdur Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq and his organization Ihya Turaath! They do not keep quiet about the people of bidah, such as Zakir Niak and Usama Bin Ladin. Likewise, they free themselves from Lashkar Taibah (Jamaa’atud Dawah) and all other people of misguidance.
And Allaah knows best
To be continued…In-Shaa-Allaah