Skip to main content

Author: Masjid Al Furqan

How does Sakeenah (tranquillity) descend upon the believers?

Question:

The questioner asks: What is Sakeenah (tranquillity) and how does it descend upon the believers?

Answer:

Sakeenah (tranquillity) is the calmness, relaxation and happiness a person feels inside his heart, and from the means of (experiencing) this Sakeenah and happiness in the heart is when one is constant in the remembrance of Allaah.  Allaah (Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections) said:

الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَتَطْمَئِنُّ قُلُوبُهُم بِذِكْرِ اللَّهِ ۗ أَلَا بِذِكْرِ اللَّهِ تَطْمَئِنُّ الْقُلُوبُ

Those who believe (in the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism), and whose hearts find rest in the remembrance of Allah, Verily, in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find rest. [13:28]

Ibnul Jawzi (rahimahullaah) said that two statements have been mentioned regarding the word Dhikr; one of them is that Dhikr means the Qur’aan and the second statement is that it means the remembrance of Allaah in general.

And with regards to the meaning of Tu’maneenah (repose or rest) there are two statements: The first one is that it is love of Allah and being completely at ease in His presence. The second meaning is that it is complete submission to Him without harbouring any doubts as opposed to those whose hearts are filled with disgust when Allaah is mentioned.

In summary: Constant remembrance of Allaah (through recitation of) the Qur’aan; remembering Him by uttering Subhaanallaah, Alhamdulil laah, Allaahu Akbar and thanking Him, sending the salaah and salaam upon His Prophet [Muhammad (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam)], constantly repenting to Allaah and seeking His Forgiveness- all these deeds bring about Sakeenah (tranquility) in the heart of the believer. And Allaah knows best.

——————————————————————————————————————

[Source: Fadaa’il Al A’maal’ pages 11-12’ by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Abdillaah As-Subayyil (rahimahullaah). Abridged and slightly paraphrased]

Reading the Qur’aan and suddenly getting preoccupied with something else

Question:

The questioner asks: If a person holds the Mushaf to read but then he gets preoccupied with another affair; so he returns after a while to (continue) reading. Is there anything (wrong) with that?

 

Answer:

There is nothing (wrong) with that because this (deed) is a supererogation act of worship.  The performer of a supererogation act of worship is rewarded, but he (or she) is sinful if he (or she) abandons it. Hopefully, the one who has asked this question will be rewarded (in-shaa-Allaah) because he was determined to carry out an act of worship with this intention (i.e. to recite the Qur’aan). Abu Hurairah (radiyallaahu-anhu) reported that the Messenger of Allaah (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said:

Whoever thinks of doing a good deed then does not do it, Allah will write it down as one complete good deed. If he thinks of doing a good deed and then does it, Allah [may He be glorified and exalted] will write it down between ten and seven hundred fold, or many more. If he thinks of doing a bad deed then he does not do it, Allah will write it down as one complete good deed, and if he thinks of it then does it, Allah will write it down as one bad deed.[Saheeh Muslim 131]

——————————————————————————————————–

[Source: Fadaa’il Al A’maal’ page 10 by Shaikh Muhammad Bin Abdillaah As-Subayyil (rahimahullaah)]

The Balanced, Unneutral, Truthful, Unadulterated and Critical Reforming Muslim Voices against the Extremists and the Extremist World View

http://www.takfiris.com/takfir/

http://www.islamagainstextremism.com/

http://salaficentre.com/2014/06/is-it-betrayal-to-turn-terrorists-in-to-the-authorities-al-allaamah-saaleh-al-fawzaan/

http://salaficentre.com/2014/07/informing-the-authorities-of-terrorist-plots-by-ustaadh-abu-khadeejah-may-allaah-preserve-him/

http://www.markazmuaadh.com/th_gallery/informing-the-authorities-of-terrorist-plots/

Kidnapping and Hijacking are actions of the khawaarij (brothers of the devil)–The Pure Salafi Methodology is free from these satanic acts!

http://salaficentre.com/2014/05/kidnapping-and-hijacking-are-actions-of-the-khawaarij-brothers-of-the-devil-the-pure-salafi-methodology-is-free-from-these-satanic-acts/

 

The Historical Influences and Effects of the Methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon Upon the Salaf   (6 Articles). Visit: www.salafipublications.com

Historical Development of the Methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen And Their Effect and Influence Upon Contemporary Salafee Dawah: Part 1

Historical Development of the Methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen And Their Effect and Influence Upon Contemporary Salafee Dawah: Part 2

Historical Development of the Methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen And Their Effect and Influence Upon Contemporary Salafee Dawah: Part 3 Updated

Historical Development of the Methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen And Their Effect and Influence Upon Contemporary Salafee Dawah: Part 4

Historical Development of the Methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen And Their Effect and Influence Upon Contemporary Salafee Dawah: Part 5 Updated

Historical Development of the Methodologies of al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen And Their Effect and Influence Upon Contemporary Salafee Dawah: Part 8 Updated

 

 

Shaikh Fawzaan says: They want differing in Aqeedah through this statement

Question:

May Allah be good to you, this questioner says: Assalaamu akaykum wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuhu, some callers put forward a principle, they say that indeed it (brings about) unity: “We unite upon that which we agree and pardon each other in that which we disagree in.”

Answer:

If this agreement is (already) in Aqeedah, then yes (we can excuse each other in other issues besides Aqeedah) as differing may occur in the subsidiary issues. The Mujtahid’s (ijtihaad) is taken when he’s correct and (the ijtihad) is abandoned if he opposes what is correct. So if there is agreement on the Aqeedah and the differing is only in Fiqh and subsidiary issues then (this affair is looked at from another) an angle. [1]

However if this differing is in Aqeedah, then upon what can we agree?! We cannot agree on anything. This is what they want apparently (i.e. excuse one another in Aqeedah issues) and this is not permissible. [2]

————————————————————————————————————–

[1]http://salaficentre.com/2015/05/a-misunderstanding-regarding-the-statement-laa-inkaar-fee-masaail-al-khilaaf-there-should-be-no-repudiation-in-the-affairs-of-khilaaf-i-e-differing/

[2] http://www.alfawzan.af.org.sa/node/14191

[1] The Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) is from humankind!

Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi (may Allaah preserve him) said:

Allaah (The Most High) said:

لَقَدْ مَنَّ اللَّهُ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ إِذْ بَعَثَ فِيهِمْ رَسُولًا مِّنْ أَنفُسِهِمْ يَتْلُو عَلَيْهِمْ آيَاتِهِ وَيُزَكِّيهِمْ وَيُعَلِّمُهُمُ الْكِتَابَ وَالْحِكْمَةَ وَإِن كَانُوا مِن قَبْلُ لَفِي ضَلَالٍ مُّبِينٍ

Indeed Allah conferred a great favour on the believers when He sent among them a Messenger (Muhammad) from among themselves, reciting unto them His Verses (the Qur’an), and purifying them (from sins by their following him), and instructing them (in) the Book (the Qur’an) and Al-Hikmah [the wisdom and the Sunnah of the Prophet (i.e. his legal ways, statements, acts of worship, etc.)], while before that they had been in manifest error. [3:164]

The Ayah is a proof that indeed the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) is from the believers.

[1] The Mufassiroon said: The intended meaning of مِّنْ أَنفُسِهِمْ – Among them’ is that he is indeed from the Arabs.

[2] Other (Mufassiroon) said: The intended meaning of (this ayah) is that he [i.e. the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alahi-wasallam)] is a human being.

In the first explanation of the above Ayah, the great favour conferred on them is that they understand the Messenger and he understands them, and they do not require a translator. In the second explanation of the above Ayah, the great favour conferred on them is that they socialize with him just as humans socialize with one another.

———————————————————–

[Source: Adwaa Islaamiyyah Alaa Ba’dil Afkaar Al-Khaati’ah. Page:56-57]

[3] [Issues Related to Correcting the Imaam When He Makes a Mistake in His Recitation]: If the Imaam makes a mistake and no one corrects him

If the Imam makes a Mistake in Recitation and no One corrects Him
Question:

If the Imam recites what is easy for him in the prayer and then he forgot the words of a Verse… and no one among the worshippers was able to correct him, should he make the Takbir and end the Rakah, or should he recite another Surah?

Answer:

He is free to choose, if he wishes, he may make the Takbir and end the Rakah, or, if he prefers, he may recite a Verse or Verses from another Surah according to what the pure Sunnah requires of him in the prayer in which he is reciting – if it (i.e. the mistake) is in other than Surah Al-Fatihah. As for Al-Fatihah, he must recite all of it, because its recitation is one of the pillars of the prayer. And Allaah is the Granter of success.

Shaykh `Abdul-`Azeez Bin Baz
Fatawa Islamiyah Vol. 2 Page 420

http://www.fatwaislam.com/fis/index.cfm?scn=fd&ID=1194

[2] Issues Related to Correcting the Imaam When He Makes a Mistake in His Recitation: The Imaam Who Recites Soorah Al-Faatihah incorrectly

Question to Imaam Albaani (rahimahullaah):

What is the ruling on praying behind the one who ‘Yalhana (makes an incorrect pronunciation) in Soorah Al-Faatiha and substituting [الصِّرَاط الْمُسْتَقِيم (As-Siraatal Mustaqeem)] to [الصراط المستكيم (As-Siraatal Muatakeem)?]

Answer:

Yes; if you are facilitated with someone who is better and better in recitation than him, then be with him (i.e. pray behind him). But if you are not facilitated with (someone else), then your Salaah behind him is sound and the burden of his lahn (i.e. incorrect pronunciation) is upon him (i.e. not your fault but his), due to the statement of the [Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam)] regarding the Imaams: ”They lead you in prayer; so if they (lead the prayer) correctly, then the (reward) is for you and them. And if they are mistaken, the (reward) is for you and the (blame) is on them.”

——————————————————————–

[Source: Silsilah Al-Hudaa Wan-Noor’ Cassette Number 806]

السائل

شيخنا ، ما حكم الصلاة خلف من يلحن في الفاتحة

بدل أن يقول { الصِّرَاط الْمُسْتَقِيم} يقول ( الصراط المستكيم ) بالعامية

الشيخ

نعم ، إذا تيسر لك من هو خير وأقرأ منه فعليك به ، وإن لم يتيسر فصلاتك من خلفه صحيحة

ووزر لحنه عليه نفسه ، لقوله – عليه الصلاة السلام – في حق الأئمة

« يصلون بكم ، فإن أصابوا فلكم ولهم ، وإن أخطئوا فلكم وعليهم »

————————————————————————————————-

 “It Is Better To Pray In The Salafi Masjid?” by Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee al-Waadi’ee

 

Question:

There is a Masjid near us whose Imaam is an Ikhwaanee who has with him oppositions to the Sharee?ah and when we pray in this Masjid they ridicule us and flee from us, so should we remain calling in this Masjid whilst in the presence of this harm, considering that the Salafi Masjid is far away?

Answer:

If you are able to go to the Salafi Masjid then I advise you with that and you will gain benefit in performing your prayer in accordance to the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah and also that you will benefit from tranquil affability with your brothers and much virtue and moral excellence. For indeed there is a Hadeeth in Saheeh Muslim on the authority of Jaabir Bin ?Abdullaah, who said:

ÎóáóÊú þ þÇáúÈöÞóÇÚõ þ þÍóæúáó ÇáúãóÓúÌöÏö ÝóÃóÑóÇÏó þ þÈóäõæ ÓóáöãóÉó þ þÃóäú íóäúÊóÞöáõæÇ Åöáóì ÞõÑúÈö ÇáúãóÓúÌöÏö ÝóÈóáóÛó Ðóáößó ÑóÓõæáó Çááøóåö þ þÕóáøóì Çááøóåõ Úóáóíúåö æóÓóáøóãó þ þÝóÞóÇáó áóåõãú þ þÅöäøóåõ ÈóáóÛóäöí Ãóäøóßõãú ÊõÑöíÏõæäó Ãóäú ÊóäúÊóÞöáõæÇ ÞõÑúÈó ÇáúãóÓúÌöÏö ÞóÇáõæÇ äóÚóãú íóÇ ÑóÓõæáó Çááøóåö ÞóÏú ÃóÑóÏúäóÇ Ðóáößó ÝóÞóÇáó íóÇ þ þÈóäöí ÓóáöãóÉó þ þÏöíóÇÑóßõãú ÊõßúÊóÈú þ þÂËóÇÑõßõãú þ þÏöíóÇÑóßõãú ÊõßúÊóÈú þ þÂËóÇÑõßõãú þ

?Some plots of land became vacant around the Masjid therefore Banu Salimah decided to relocate near the Masjid. When the news of that reached the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) he said to them:

?Indeed it has reached me that you intend to relocate near the Masjid?.

They said: ?Yes, O Messenger of Allaah that is what we have decided?. Thereupon he (the Prophet) said:

?O Banu Salimah, live in your houses, for your steps are recorded; live in your houses, for your steps are recorded?.?

Meaning: Stay in your houses which are far away from the Masjid so that your steps are recorded for you.

And in the Saheehayn (Sahih al-Bukharee and Saheeh al-Muslim) on the authority of Abu Hurairah (radiAllaahu ?anhu) that verily the Prophet of Allaah(sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said:

ÅöÐóÇ ÊóæóÖøóÃó ÝóÃóÍúÓóäó ÇáúæõÖõæÁó Ëõãøó ÎóÑóÌó Åöáóì ÇáúãóÓúÌöÏö áÇ íõÎúÑöÌõåõ ÅöáÇøó ÇáÕøóáÇÉõ áóãú íóÎúØõ ÎóØúæóÉð ÅöáÇøó ÑõÝöÚóÊú áóåõ ÈöåóÇ ÏóÑóÌóÉñ æóÍõØøó Úóäúåõ ÈöåóÇ ÎóØöíÆóÉñ ÝóÅöÐóÇ Õóáøóì áóãú ÊóÒóáú ÇáúãóáÇÆößóÉõ ÊõÕóáøöí Úóáóíúåö ãóÇ ÏóÇãó Ýöí ãõÕóáÇåõ Çááøóåõãøó Õóáøö Úóáóíúåö Çááøóåõãøó ÇÑúÍóãúåõ æóáÇ íóÒóÇáõ ÃóÍóÏõßõãú Ýöí ÕóáÇÉò ãóÇ ÇäúÊóÙóÑó ÇáÕøóáÇÉóþ

?He who performs ablution and purifies himself well, then leaves to go the Masjid and nothing causes him to go out except for the Prayer, he does not take a step except that it raises him in rank and a sin is removed from him. And if he prays the angels do not cease to pray for him, as long as he is at his Musalla (praying place): ?O Allaah, send prayers upon him, O Allaah, have mercy upon him?. And each one of you is regarded in prayer so long as he is waiting for the Prayer.?

Hence, if they are able to attend the Salafi Masjid this is a pleasant affair if not then I advise them to acquire/obtain a Masjid for themselves which is not over burdensome in expenditure for truly the Prophet (sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) says:

þ þãóÇ ÃõãöÑúÊõ ÈöÊóÔúíöíÏö ÇáúãóÓóÇÌöÏö

?I was not ordered with building lofty extravagant Masjids?.

And he also said:

þ þþáÇ ÊóÞõæãõ ÇáÓøóÇÚóÉõ ÍóÊøóì þþ íóÊóÈóÇåóì ÇáäøóÇÓõ Ýöí ÇáúãóÓóÇÌöÏö

?The Hour will not be established until the people vie with one another in boastfulness with regards to the Masjids?.

So the Sunnah is that the Masjid should be modest and simple. And if you are able to [construct] the Masjid, that it is like the Masjid of the Messenger of Allaah(sallAllaahu alayhi wa sallam) then do so, if you are not able to then do not overburden yourself and do not be lavish in building the Masjids for indeed it is opposes the Sunnah, likewise the adornments and the minarets. Also the likes of what they call al-Mihraab and that which they put up on the four corners of the Masjids and what they call ash-Shurufaat (balconies and terraces), this was not found in the Masjid of the Messenger of Allaah when he built it at that time and likewise the Mimbar which is elevated in excess of three steps.

Wa Laa Illaaha IllAllaah, for indeed there has not come to me a person regardless of whether he is from Eritrea or from Indonesia or from the Sudan and other than them from the Islamic countries except that he complains from the harms of Ikhwaan al-Mufliseen* (Brotherhood of the Bankrupt Ones) to the Ahlus-Sunnah. Then I say, to Allaah is the complaint, so they are ready to reconcile with the communist and with the Mulhid (atheist) and with the Secularist and with the Ba?thists, and with the Naasirites and with the Sufis and with the Shiites whilst they are not prepared to reconcile with the Sunni except when the time for elections draws near, indeed then they say:

?Be silent concerning us and we will remain silent concerning you?.

=========

Footnote: * ‘Al-Ikhwaan Al-Muslimeen’ (The Muslim Brotherhood) A group founded by Hassan al-Banna in Egypt and which serves as an umbrella organisation to accommodate all and sundry, regardless of deviation in creed and methodology. Syed Qutb is another figurehead for ‘Al-Ikhwaan’ who has been refuted by many scholars. Many have been mislead in these times by this corrupted methodology.

See Link

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=6&Topic=5007

Shaykh Muqbil bin Haadee
Tuhfatul-Mujeeb ‘Alaa Asilatil-Haadhir wal-Ghareeb, page 129-131.
Translated by Abu ‘Abdillaah Bilaal al-Kashmiri

 

[Source: http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=6&Topic=5007 ]

 

[1] Issues Related to Correcting the Imaam When He Makes a Mistake in His Recitation

Question to Imaam Muhammad Ibn Saaleh Al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah):

Is it obligated on the Ma’moon (i.e. those being led in prayer by the Imaam) to rectify the Imaam if he makes a mistake in his recitation?

Answer:

If the Imaam makes a mistake in the ‘Obligatory Recitation’ such as the recitation of (Surah) Faatihah, it obligated on the  Ma’moon (i.e. those praying behind him) to disclose that to him (i.e. by rectifying him). If the recitation is Mustahab (i.e. recommended), we contemplate (on the following): If he changed the meaning, it is then obligated on him to repeat it [i.e. rectifies the mistake when prompted by the Ma’moon or if he (himself) realizes that he made a mistake that changes the meaning]. And if he has not changed the meaning, it is not obligatory (i.e. to rectify him).

—————————————————————————————-

[Source: http://www.ajurry.com/vb/showthread.php?t=39055]

Reminder to our noble brothers and sisters at Masjid Al-Furqan (Stoke): Arm yourselves with these clarifications in order to guide the common people away from those who defend Goldie and others from ahlul bidah

Shaikh Muhammad Baazmool (may Allaah preserve him) responded to the statement of some of the people who say: ‘Do Not Scrutinize the Beliefs and Mistakes of the People.’

Response

This statement is reiterated by some people when warning reaches them from one of the scholars or a student of knowledge against innovated statements (or views) views that have occurred from some of the people, or when informed about mistakes committed in knowledge and he is given warning against it, you find that his face becomes red, his (behaviour) changes and he says, ‘Do not scrutinize the beliefs of the people and do not search for their mistakes.’

The reality is that this statement is truth by way of which falsehood is sought in this particular instance.

Firstly: The right place to (use this statement) is where one seeks after secrets and hidden affairs, which have neither manifested nor are there any factual evidences indicating towards that. The place (where this statement cannot be used) is  where innovation arises from one of (the people) or when one of them calls to falsehood, since there is a difference between that which is manifested and that which is either concealed, hidden and unknown, or that there is no indication towards that.

Secondly: This statement of theirs will lead to the abandonment of warning against mistakes and censure against innovation and falsehood.  And the meaning of this is that the common people will be beguiled, rather even some of the students of knowledge will become inattentive to this situation.

Thirdly: Was the speech of the Salaf with regards to warning against innovation and the people of falsehood not (carried out) from the angle of warning against false beliefs, innovations and affairs in opposition to the Sunnah?  So how can it be said, ‘do not scrutinize the beliefs and mistakes of the people’ to a person who either warns against an innovation manifested by an individual or points out a mistake committed by an individual?

Fourthly: Scrutinizing the beliefs of the people by way of interrogation and trial as the Khaleefah Mamoon did with regards to the belief that the (Qur’aan is created), then this is an innovation that is warned against.  (However) to make a clarification and (issue) warning against an innovation that some people call to, unveiling the falsehood of the callers to falsehood and (issue) warning against them, this is not from that (type of scrutiny that is warned against).

Fifthly: Those (people) who blame the one who unveils the (affairs) of the people of falsehood and issues warning against them, then it is that they either disapprove of innovations or do not.  If they disapprove of innovation; point out mistakes and falsehood and warn against them, then indeed they have pursued the right course by the Will of Allaah (The Most High). But why do they disapprove of those who take their place in renouncing innovation?! And if they do not warn the people against falsehood, then this (behaviour or stance of theirs) is not from the methodology of the Salaf and it suffices as a rebuke against them.

Sixthly: It has been reported in Durar As-Saniyyah (1/33) that the Imaam, the Mujaddid, Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah) said: I hold that the people of innovation are to be boycotted and their affair is to be made known until they repent.  I pass judgement against them based on what is apparent and I leave their secrets (or hidden) affairs to Allaah.  And I believe that every newly invented matter in the Religion is an innovation.

This [statement of Imaam Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah)] is the statement of a Salafiy Athariy [i.e. a true follower of the Salaf and the authentic narrations] that emanates from the statement of Umar Ibnul Khattaab (radiyallaahu-anhu) when he said:

‘People were (sometimes) judged by the revealing of a Divine Inspiration during the lifetime of Allah’s Apostle but now there is no longer any more (new revelation). Now we judge you by the deeds you practice publicly, so we will trust and favour the one who does good deeds in front of us, and we will not call him to account about what he is really doing in secret, for Allah will judge him for that; but we will not trust or believe the one who presents to us with an evil deed even if he claims that his intentions were good.’ [Saheeh Bukhaari; Vol 3; Hadith Number:2641]

So examine the statement of Imaam Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah), when he said: ‘I judge (ahlul bidah) based upon what is apparent’‘ and examine the statement of Umar Ibnul Khattaab (radiyallaahu-anhu) when he said, ‘but we will not trust or believe the one who presents to us with an evil deed even if he claims that his intentions were good.’  Then examine the (affair) of that person who disapproves of one who warns against ahlul bidah and exposes their falsehood, he claims that (this warning against ahlul bidah) is from the angle of scrutinizing the Aqeedah of the people.  Is this (statement of his) correct? Glorified and Exalted You are, O My Lord!  Is not judgement passed against the people except through what is apparent?! This principle affirmed by Al Faarooq, Umar Ibnul Khattaab (radiyallaah-anhu) is employed in warning against a person of innovation when he manifests his innovation. [1]

The Stance of Imaam Ahmad towards Daawood Ibn Ali Al- Asbahaanee

Daawood Ibn Ali Al-Asbahaanee came to Saaleh Ibn Imaam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal with whom he used to have a good relationship.  So he (Daawood) spoke to Saaleh Ibn Imaam Ahmad to make it easy for him to meet his father.

So Saaleh approached Imaam Ahmad (i.e. his father) and said; A man asked me to bring him to you.

Imaam Ahmad: What is his name?

Saaleh: Daawood.

Imaam Ahmad: Where is he from?

Saaleh: He is from the people of Asbahaan.

Imaam Ahmad: Has he being (involved) in fabricating anything?

At this point: Saaleh refrained from describing Daawood to his father (Imaam Ahmad).  So he (Imaam Ahmad) did not stop enquiring about Daawood until he realized who he was.  Then he said: Muhammad Bin Yahyaa An-Naysabooree wrote to me about this (Daawood) saying that he (Daawood) claims that the Qur’aan is something that was brought into existence (i.e. created), so do not bring him near me.

Saaleh: O my father! he (Daawood) has negated and renounced this (statement).

Imaam Ahmad: Muhammad Bin Yahyaa is more trustworthy than him.  I do not give you permission to bring him to me.

O my brother! Contemplate upon the stance of Imaam Ahmad.  Is this the Imaam? He is the Imaam of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaa’ah in his adherence to the Sunnah of the Prophet (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) and in following the narrations of the Sahaabah; so did he use to scrutinize the beliefs of the people and seek after their mistakes?!  Examine his statement and that of Umar Ibnul Khattaab mentioned earlier, ‘but we will not trust or believe the one who presents to us with an evil deed even if he claims that his intentions were good.’

Therefore, the statement of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhaab (rahimahullaah) is certified by the statement of the Rightly Guided Khaleefah Umar Ibnul Khattaab (radiyallaahu-anhu) and that of Imaam Ahmad Bin Hanbal (rahimahullaah). [2]

——————————————————————————————————-
[1] Source: ‘Ibaaraat Moohimah’ pages 66-68; by Shaikh Umar Baazmool (may Allaah preserve him)

[2] Ibaaraat Moohimah’ pages: 66-69